|
|
![]() About me Contact me |
Articles recently commented on:
Follow Mar Matthias on Twitter Follow Rev. Mother Theresa on Twitter Website thumbnails generously provided by ShrinkTheWeb |
Agenda 21: its importance by Mar Matthias Darin I've recently posted all forty chapters of the United Nation's Agenda 21. Why? Well, because it is an important document that describes several critical points on social sustainability. We as a society must have a way to provide the resources required to survive. Agenda 21 attempts to lay out a framework that provides steps on accomplishing this. If you want to take a closer look or want to re-read any of Agenda 21, here are each of the chapters: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40. Agenda 21 is designed as a blueprint for our future and our children's future. It addresses these key points: Agriculture, Biodiversity & Ecosystem Management, Education, Energy,Housing, Population, Public Health, Resources and Recycling, Social Justice, Toxic Technology & Waste Management, Transportation, Viable Economy. It all sounds great on paper. The question really is how well is this blueprint actually going to work and are the costs realistic. We should also consider the governing body that will enforce these policies. Agenda 21 has a vast number of details that are implied and not stated as well. Ironically, when I started posting the Agenda 21 content, there wasn't much talk about a global crises of the supposed impending doom of our economic system. There also wasn't much talk about the United States moving towards socialism or the special interest groups pushing all this. Agenda 21 has a huge list of special interest groups. Here's a brief list or groups: feminist, globalist, environmental, and welfare organizations such as the Sierra Club, Earthlinks, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, Greener Alternatives, Pacific Bell, Peace Child, United Nations Association-USA, Environmental Ecological Services, Change Management System, Countywide Joint Task Force on Sexual Harassment, Prevention and Education, and the Human Care Alliance (about 80 service providers and community groups), and the Welfare and Low-Income Support Network. Most social service leaders tend to push a socialist agenda and many have little or no tolerance for anyone who resists their intrusive family policies. We must also keep in mind that Agenda 21 (silently) advocates a centralized government and that all people submit to that centralized authority. This sounds very much like the one world government. What country wants to surrender their sovereignty to a government that has no idea what issues are paramount to that country. The "one size fits all" approach often leaves a significant number of people without representation. This in and of itself is troubling. Think of it this way, Agenda 21 is like having someone tell you how you should run your house and what you should buy when that someone lives on the other side of the world in an entirely different climate. Imagine being in the middle of winter and this someone decides that you can't run your heater because where they are is over a hundred degrees. The costs of Agenda 21 are staggering. It is estimated, by the United Nations, that implementing Agenda 21 will cost six hundred billion dollars per year for at least seven years. It is assumed that the members of the United Nations are going to dish out this enormous amount of money. With a large number of Unite Nations members suffering for recessionary issues, funding Agenda 21's behemoth appetite is unrealistic to say the least. The below chart illustrates what has and has not been done: ![]() As you can see, there is a long ways to go. Agenda 21 started in 1993 and was slated for completion by the year 2000. Going by the above chart, there is a lot more that needs doing and Agenda 21 is already nine years behind. The costs are literally choking any country involved. Was Agenda 21 a good idea? perhaps at one time in the very beginning. Is it a realistic approach to globalize every single human being on this planet? I don't think so. A "globalized" society has some massive pitfalls like the obliteration of all cultures and traditional ways a particular country may have, surrendering all forms of a local government, and the sacrifice of all belief systems, religious or otherwise. Agenda 21 clearly has some major problems and issues that we must be aware of irregardless of our social, political, religious, and economic views. What may seem like a good idea on the surface is undoubtably anything but. Top tags: agenda, united, country, government, groups, nations, social, costs, idea, issues
PermaLink Home
Please share your thoughts on this article. |
|